logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.07.05 2016고단2583
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 2, 2016, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) on the road in front of the “C cafeteria” located in the Busan Northern-gu, Busan Northern-gu; (b) on the 29,100 won of taxi charges without justifiable grounds, even though he/she was boarding a cab operated by the victim D in front of the “C cafeteria,” and moved to the front of the “G” located in Suwon-gu, Busan, the Busan, the purpose of which is around 04:59 on the same day, via the water area located in the 677-ro.

Therefore, even though the defendant was on board a cab for business use, he did not set up a value without justifiable reasons.

2. On April 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 04:59, on the street in front of “G” located in Busan LOF; (b) if the victim D (57 years old) demanding the payment of taxi charges by operating a taxi as set forth in paragraph (1), “she has stolen the wall,” then she walked Si expenses; and (c) if the victim’s left face is taken one time on the part of the victim’s drinking, the Defendant she saw the victim to undergo approximately three weeks medical treatment.

3. On April 2, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties in front of the convenience store of “I” located in H of the Busan Sancho-gu, Busan, on April 2, 2016. In order to ask the Defendant questions about the details of the assault, etc. from K and the police box belonging to the Busan Fari Police Station, who was dispatched to the scene after receiving the report of the above D- 112, as set forth in paragraph 2, the Defendant calculated the bitbit of bit of a bitch, bit of a bitch.

Degradation, brudation,

때리긴 뭘 때려, 시 발 나도 공무원이다.

“Absing off clothes, booming the body of the said K, etc. while taking a bath as “,” and received once as head the said L’s mouth.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers K and L crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made against D or L;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 136 (1) and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, and Article 3 (1) 39 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of penalty:

arrow