The judgment below

The remainder other than the confiscated part shall be reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

1. The main points of the grounds for appeal are as follows: (a) the lower court’s punishment (two years of imprisonment, and 1st knife knife knife) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant, in violation of the signal, caused injury to the victim, such as a credit prop-off, which requires six weeks’ medical treatment, by leading the victim to entering the intersection in order to avoid punishment immediately after the crime of this case. However, in light of the degree of negligence by the defendant, such as hiding the vehicle, the victim’s injury, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the crime is considerably poor. On March 17, 2011, the defendant committed a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Death) in relation to the crime that caused the death of the victim due to the occupational negligence committed while driving a motor vehicle at the Jeonju District Court and Jung-Eup Branch Branch branch of the Jeonju District Court on March 17, 201, the defendant was sentenced to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (the same court on May 28, 2012) by driving a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol level of 0.050 percent alcohol level at the same court.

However, the defendant was detained for about seven months in prison, and thus his criminal act is divided and reflected during the investigation stage from the investigation stage to the trial of the court. The defendant escaped immediately after the crime of this case, but he was voluntarily present at the investigation agency after one week, and the victim received five million won from the defendant in the investigation process and expressed his intention not to punish the defendant, and the defendant additionally paid three million won for medical expenses other than the above agreed amount to the victim in the trial. The victim expressed his intention not to punish the defendant again, and after 2013, the defendant tried to take the action.