(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.06.16 2014나2037376

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.06.16 2014나2037376

보험금

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The grounds for a judgment of the first instance shall be quoted for this judgment pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act citing the judgment of the first instance;

However, some of the following shall be dismissed, and the judgment on the allegations made by the plaintiff in this court shall be added.

2. The part of the first instance court's decision 5-3-7 (the part of the plaintiff's assertion, hereinafter "the plaintiff's assertion") shall be written in the following manner:

“B found the disease of each and each and each of the following parts of the instant insurance contracts during the course of the Plaintiff’s self-explosive surgery for the treatment of the Plaintiff’s womb. This constitutes “when the Plaintiff has lost all of the two parts of the disease,” one of the “when the Plaintiff lost all of the two parts of the disease” stipulated in the Clause of the Insurance Contract of this case [Attachment I] due to a disease diagnosed during the insurance period of this case.

3. Additional determination

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion: (a) in a case where there was an outbreak of satisfy in a single satisfy in a single satch, if removal of satisfy in a single satisfy, it is probable that the satisfy in another satch is likely to occur in another satisfy in another satfy in the future; and (b) in a case where there was an outbreak of satisfy in a single satch only in a single satch, it is recognized as a normal treatment method to satisfy the other satisfy in a different satch; and (c) in a case where the satisfy in a two satch is recognized as having causal relationship with the treatment of satisfy in a right satfy in a way that the satisfy in a

Therefore, there is a causal link between the Plaintiff’s self-refinite or self-refinite disease and the control of both sides of the accident, and therefore, it constitutes a ground for the payment of insurance money stipulated in the special terms and conditions of the insurance contract

B. According to the statement No. 5, the statement is as follows.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2015.6.16.선고 2014나2037376 판결

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.9.4.선고 2013가합543543 판결

-인천지방법원 2015.7.14.선고 2015가합51148 판결

-대구지방법원 2020.02.12 2019가단101370

-대전고등법원(청주) 2019.04.10 2017나6628