The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

On August 10, 2016, at around 20:00, the Defendant demanded a victim’s “D” restaurant located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, where he works as the main room, to present his own labor contract to the victim, and then the victim destroyed the said contract by means of tearing or exposing it at a dry-ju and the restaurant warehouse, and then dumping it at an unknown place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness C and E;

1. Each police statement protocol against C and E;

1. E statements;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 366 (Selection of Penalty Penalty)

1. Penalty fine of 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (the fact that the injured person does not want the punishment against the accused, the fact that the accused has no record of crime prior to the instant case, and other circumstances revealed in the pleadings, such as the age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, result, etc. of the defendant);