Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal records] On July 17, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for an injury at the Jeonju District Court on August 31, 2015, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on August 31, 2015. On April 28, 2016, the Jeonju District Court sentenced the Defendant to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on March 7, 2017.
[Criminal facts] 2017 Highest 1243
1. On April 20, 2017, the Defendant: (a) heard from the Defendant’s female-friendly job offers victim C (here, 22 years of age) at the time of the new wall; (b) “I am going to contact in the future; (c) I am going to the house; and (d) I am to the victim’s house living together with the Defendant in Ilyang-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-car-car-dong-car-do in order for the victim to open the entrance, and caused damage to the entrance above.
2. The injured Defendant destroyed the house entrance of the victim C at the time, place, as mentioned in paragraph 1, and entered the said house and saw the victim “(s) for the same year.”
After taking a bath with a large voice, the victim saw the victim's neck twice in both hands, and the victim saw the victim's face one time as drinking, with the victim's arms and shoulder, and damaged the victim's body by breaking it over the floor, and then breaking it over the victim's body with a hand, the victim saw the victim's eye and shoulder and breaking it into the floor for about two weeks.
"2017 Highest 1289"
1. On March 21, 2017, the Defendant: (a) Kafe, operated by the victim F in Sinsan-dong-gu E in Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si on March 21, 2017; (b) womd with the Defendant
C and immediately after NNN, C were found to have been employed as an employee, and C was able to play an action, such as her humna and her humna and her humna, and her humna.