A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

25,000,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

As to the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant who violated the law of 2018 Gohap 173- Attorney-at-law is a person who operates a "D architect office" with a certified architect C in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Metropolitan City.

From June 2013, the Defendant stated “three Dong 4 households” as “three Dong 4 households” in the instant indictment from the Incheon Seo-gu F and G from around June 2013. However, according to the evidence, it is evident that “three Dong 44 households” is a clerical error in the evidence of “three Dong 44 households,” thereby correcting it ex officio (236,145 pages of the evidence of 2018 High Gohap 173 Incident).

In the process of the new construction work, E completed the construction work on March 2014 after the Defendant was in charge of the design, but he became aware that the construction work was done in a horizontal way differently from the roof slope pattern designed by the above I roof of the Ba.

On March 2014, the Defendant should remove the first floor in conflict with the right to sunshine in order to pass the completion inspection due to a mistake in the construction of the Bara at the construction site of the Bara.

If it is well possible to help the public official in charge of the Gu office to pass the completion inspection without removal, the case is requested to be "100 million won in return for it."

“After obtaining consent, upon obtaining approval from the Gu office on May 8, 2014, the use of the loan (construction) was approved by the Gu office, and on May 5, 2014, in the middle of the construction site, “I wish to design the new construction of the loan to be carried out in the future” to E at the non-cafeteria cafeteria of the trade name around the above construction site.

50,000,000 won.

“Around June 17, 2014, “The amount of KRW 25 million out of the KRW 50 million shall be invested in JBD, which is in progress by the Party,” and the remaining amount of KRW 25 million shall be sent by telephone around June 17, 2014.

different types.

“At the request of the Defendant, KRW 25 million was transferred to the K Bank account in the name of the Defendant (the sum of KRW 30 million in the name of the return of the construction cost, which the Defendant paid on behalf of E, was transferred to KRW 5 million) on the same day.

In this respect, the defendant solicits for the affairs handled by the public officials.