The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On March 2017, the Defendant injured the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by stating that “The victim D, who is the head of the cleaning management office, has not embezzled the employee’s allowance to the head of the cleaning management office, shall be deemed to have set up a separate allowance. However, whether the warden had silented, and whether the president had silented.”

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-compliance with an intention (Articles 307(2) and 312(2) of the Criminal Act);

B. After the prosecution of this case, a written agreement is submitted to the effect that “the victim does not want punishment of the defendant.”

(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act);