logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.09.18 2015가합533809
유체동산인도
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. On August 27, 2014, the Plaintiff, a representative director of the Plaintiff, visited the location of the head office recorded in the register of corporate register after being newly appointed as the representative director of the Plaintiff. However, the Plaintiff did not transfer the documents listed in the attached list, which are important documents concerning the Plaintiff’s trade books and business, (hereinafter “instant documents”) to C, and thus, the Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff is liable to deliver the instant documents owned by the Plaintiff.

However, each statement of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including paper numbers) is insufficient to recognize that the defendant is keeping and possessing the documents of this case, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow