logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 특허법원 2017.08.11 2017허1939
권리범위확인(특)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On September 29, 2016, the Defendant filed a claim against the patentee of the instant patent invention on September 29, 2016, and filed a claim against the Intellectual Property Tribunal for a trial to confirm the scope of patent rights, and the invention in question being conducted by the Defendant is the claim 1 through 4 of the instant patent invention (hereinafter “instant Claim 1”).

2) On February 15, 2017, the Intellectual Property Trial and Appeal Board rendered a trial ruling accepting the above request for a trial (hereinafter “instant trial ruling”) on the ground that the invention subject to confirmation does not fall under the scope of the right of the instant claim for a trial on the grounds that it does not fall under the scope of the right of the instant claim for a trial.

The Defendant filed a trial for invalidation of the instant patent invention on September 29, 2016. The Plaintiff et al. filed a trial for invalidation of the patent application on December 28, 2016, and the patentees, et al. filed a petition for rectification of the claim 1 of the instant patent invention and deletion of claims 2 through 4. The Intellectual Property Tribunal deliberated on the petition as 2016Da3011 and tried on February 15, 2017, and rendered a trial ruling accepting the Defendant’s petition for invalidation on the ground that the nonobviousness of the instant patent invention is denied by prior inventions.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking revocation of the decision by the Patent Court No. 2017Heo1922, but the Patent Court rendered a decision dismissing the Plaintiff’s claim on August 11, 2017.

B. The name of the invention of this case (Evidence 2) 1: B) filing date/registration date/registration number: C/D/E3: The patentee of the patent claim of this case 1) : The construction method of the shot beam of the claim 1 (s) and the shot beam of the concrete panel (20) produced by combining the plaintiff, the corporation F/L 4 with the shot beam of the claim 1 (s) and the shot beam of the concrete panel (20) (hereinafter referred to as the "shot beam of the constituent elements 1") , and the fritha concrete panel (20) 1) . The neutral axis of the frithath concrete panel (20) or the lower part below.

arrow