1. The Defendants: (a) KRW 20,169,189 for each Plaintiff; and (b) KRW 5% per annum from September 18, 201 to October 29, 2014 for each Plaintiff.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) Defendant C is the motor bicycle without a license for a motorcycle on September 18, 201 (hereinafter referred to as “motor vehicle for the instant year”) with no license for a motorcycle driver on September 18, 201.

ii)A motor bicycle with no driver's license (hereinafter referred to as the "victimed vehicle of this case") that has driven the motor vehicle of this case and driven along the center line in the direction of the e-mail front of the E-ray in Daejeon, facing the center line in the direction of the hiven distance from the hiven distance to the hiven distance from the hiven distance to the hiven distance to the hiven distance to the hiven distance to the hiven area.

2) Defendant 1 had the front part of the instant damaged vehicle, and caused the Plaintiff to incur injury to the right side of the instant damaged vehicle, i.e., the instant damaged vehicle’s front part of the instant damaged vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”). As a result, the Plaintiff suffered injury to the Plaintiff, i.e., a combination of 3 suspended aggregates, the right side of 4,5 pelle adjacent abandonment, and the brain la

(2) Defendant C was a student who was in the second year of high school as of September 18, 201, and Defendant C was the father of Defendant C.

3) The instant sea vehicle is a vehicle closed for use, without a license plate attached, and was placed in front of the Fow operated by Defendant C, and the key was kept in the said shop’s Kabro, which was kept in the said shop’s Kabro. 4) Defendant B was aware that the instant sea vehicle was owned by Defendant C, his father, and was engaged in driving of the instant sea vehicle in order to assist Defendant C’s Kabro business.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2-1, Gap evidence 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

(b) 1. In order to deny the responsibility of a person operating under Article 3 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act as loss of his operating control and operating profit, the custody and management status of the passenger car or the keys thereof, the circumstances in which the operation is possible regardless of the owner’s intent, the personal relationship between the owner and the driver, and the ex post facto consent of the owner after the unauthorized operation.