logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.08.22 2018고단2096
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Except as otherwise expressly provided for in other Acts and subordinate statutes, no person shall borrow or lend any access medium used in electronic financial transactions while receiving, demanding or promising the consideration therefor.

Nevertheless, on March 27, 2018, the defendant sent a written advertisement message to the mobile phone of the defendant around March 27, 2018 is a private sports earth company.

At present, the period for seeking a borrowed-name account is the period for seeking.

It is intended to lend a e-mail card to KRW 2 million per e-mail.

“The proposal received and accepted it.”

On March 28, 2018, the Defendant, via Kwikset Service Articles, visited in order to receive the e-mail card, sent the e-mail card to the name in order to obtain the e-mail, and sent the e-mail card to the name in the name of the Defendant via Kwikset Service Articles, 1 head of the e-mail card connected with the e-mail account in the name of the Defendant. On April 2018, the Defendant sent the e-mail card to the name in order to receive the e-mail card through Kwikset Service Articles, 1 head of the e-mail card connected with the name in the name of the Defendant, and the password to G message.

As a result, the Defendant promised to pay for the access media used in electronic financial transactions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the G dialogue content Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 2 of the Act on the Electronic Financial Transactions in the relevant Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (excluding punishment)

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (such as the fact that the defendant has no criminal record, and the means of access lent by the defendant have not been used for actual crimes) of the Criminal Act attracting the workhouse;

arrow