A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 2019, the Defendant accepted a proposal that “to have a corporate account opened and get a loan,” from a person under whose name the Internet page loan advertisement was reported and contacted, and accepted it, and established B as a “limited company” upon the direction of the person under whose name the case was not registered.

1. In a bank interfering with business, where an account is opened in the name of a corporation, the bank is likely to be liable for damages depending on the negligence when the relevant account is used for a financial fraud crime, etc. As such, whether the relevant corporation is a normal corporation is an important confirmation matter in the business of opening the bank’s account, and in accordance with the Financial Supervisory Service’s comprehensive measures to eradicate large-scale losses and burdens on the national economy, which was implemented since November 2012, the bank explains to the customer the illegality of the transfer of the passbook, and requires the customer to confirm and sign the account, and refuses to open the account where the purpose is unclear or it is intended to lend or transfer the means of access, such as the passbook, cash card,

Nevertheless, around June 11, 2019, the Defendant submitted documents necessary for opening an account, such as the Plaintiff’s business registration certificate, the entire registration matters, etc., to the employees of the said C Bank, by pretending that the “Limited Company B” established under the order of the said C Bank D branch for the purpose of obtaining a loan is a company normally operated, and applied for opening the account under the name of the said C Bank. The fact prevents the establishment of the account of the C Bank by fraudulent means, such as hidinging such fact, even though the Defendant was thought to transfer the passbook, etc. connected with the account opened as above to another person.