logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.10.14 2020고단4710
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accident after Accidents) are those engaged in driving motor vehicles Benz50;

On March 21, 2020, at around 03:46, the Defendant changed the course while driving a three-lane of the road in front of the Kimpop road in the direction of the south side of the opposite side of the Sungpop road, as the Olympic Games, from the Sungpop road located in the pressure of Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, to the direction of the south side of the road.

At the time, there is a night and a white solid line prohibiting change of course. In such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely without changing course for a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and received the left side of the Dunetna taxi operated by the victim C who had been operating along the marp taxi due to the negligence of changing the course beyond the above white domin line as a mar access road that leads from the two-lane to the Olympic line, and caused the shock to get the mar on the right side of the mar.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim E (ma, 26 years of age) and the victim F (ma, 29 years of age), who is the passenger of the above taxi, on the part of the other parts of the arms elbow and tension, etc. requiring approximately two-day medical treatment, and at the same time, did not take necessary measures, such as destroying the above taxi to the extent that the repair cost of KRW 875,015, including the exchange of the front cab, and escape without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victim.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is a holder of Benzs and 550 automobiles.

No person shall operate any motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance on a road.

Nevertheless, the defendant operated the car without being covered by the automobile mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1.

arrow