1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Plaintiff corresponding to the following additional payment order shall be revoked.

1. On March 27, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Defendant due to the violation of the Act on Registration of Credit Business, etc. and Protection of Finance Users, interference with business, and intrusion upon residence.

The defendant was indicted by the Changwon District Court Heading 2013Hun-Ma681 and was sentenced to imprisonment on April 23, 2014 and two years of suspended execution on the following criminal facts, and this judgment became final and conclusive as it is.

No one may receive interest exceeding the rate of 30% per annum in a case where any unregistered credit service provider that received interest exceeding the rate of restriction 1) is making a loan. Defendant (referring to Defendant)

hereinafter the same shall apply.

A (as of December 25, 2010) is an obligor A (as of December 25, 2010) who is in macro-si C.

hereinafter the same shall apply.

(2) From the D Line of Operation, a person who intends to engage in a credit business without registration shall file a registration with the competent authority having jurisdiction over the relevant place of business to lend 2.2 billion won in total 24 times from the said date to January 2013 in the same manner as indicated in the attached Table 2 (Attachment 1 to 2 (2). (2) Any person who intends to engage in a credit business without registration shall file a registration with the competent authority having jurisdiction over the relevant place of business. (3) Any person who intends to engage in a credit business without registration, as described in the attached Table 2 (Attachment 2).

The Defendant, from December 25, 2010 to January 2013, operated a credit business without registering it with the competent authorities in the Dongbaon area.

B. At around 01:40 on January 1, 2013, the Defendant: (a) opened a door door and opened a door door on the ground that the victim’s residence was not paid in time to the victim A; and (b) infringed upon the victim’s residence, such as entering the door door and leaving the door door to “not having paid in money,” and going against the disturbance. 2) On March 26, 2013, the Defendant came into the said residence of the victim for the purpose of collecting the claim that the victim would not pay in money.