A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is in a legal marital relationship with the victim B (V, 46 years of age).

On October 11, 2017, the Defendant was found to have been drunkly found in the D frequency in which a person who suffered damage under Seojin-gu Seoul, Jeonjin-gu, Seoul, worked as an employee on October 11, 2017, and was under the influence of alcohol.

The knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif

“The victim,” and the victim of play, who tried to have knife the left hand of the head knife by defing the victim’s knife with the left hand, and to break the knife in the face of the visit by pushing the knife and pushed the knife into the knife. The victim escaped after leaving the knife.

Accordingly, the defendant carried a dangerous knife knife and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph a crime after capturing the crime;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Procedure (Article 62(1) of the same Act) provides that a prosecutor has ordered confiscation of the seized knife (Article 62(1)1), but it cannot be recognized that the above articles provided in the criminal act do not belong to another person who is not the defendant, and thus, the victim B is the owner of the above knife, and at the time of the instant crime, the defendant and the victim maintained legal marital relationship. However, the above knife had been possessed by the defendant at the house in which the defendant and the victim were living together, and it is presumed that the kn