1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. After being appointed as a local fire assistant on February 21, 1994, the Plaintiff promoted to a local fire assistant on October 26, 2007. From July 6, 2010, the Plaintiff was in charge of the first-aid duties while serving in Yangcheon Fire Captain B 119 Safety Center.

B. On September 7, 2012, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Mayor, following the resolution of the Fire Officials Disciplinary Committee, instructed the Plaintiff to transfer the patient whose consciousness is unknown at around 23:19 on June 11, 2012, a superior and the first responder on his/her first-aid vehicle to a school of the next generation, who operated the first-aid vehicle to the front of the emergency department at the Korea University University of University, Germany, and operated the first-aid vehicle to the next in front of the emergency department at the university of the next generation, who operated the first-aid vehicle to the second in front of the emergency department at the university of the next generation, without any special reason, and again moved to the third in the third in the second in the second in the second in the second in the second in the second in the second in the second in the second in the second in the second in the second in the second in the second in the second in the second in the year, and removed the first in the first in the second in the second in the second in the second in the year from September 28 to December 2012.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disciplinary action”). C.

The Plaintiff appealed to the instant disciplinary action and filed an appeal review with the appeals review committee, but the said committee dismissed it on December 13, 2012.

On January 8, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Seoul Administrative Court seeking the revocation of the instant disciplinary action with the Seoul Administrative Court. However, on January 7, 2014, the Seoul Administrative Court rendered a judgment dismissing the Plaintiff’s claim on the grounds that “the instant disciplinary action is not defective in the process and all grounds for disciplinary action are recognized, and it is reasonable to take a disciplinary action,” (Seoul Administrative Court 2013Guhap710), and this judgment is the same on April 2, 2015, following the Seoul High Court (Seoul High Court 2014Nu1279) and the final appeal (Supreme Court 2014Du15412).