1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the cases being cited or added as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary or added parts] Following the 12th 5th 5th 12th 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the defendant asserts that the astronomical construction claimed by the plaintiff is included in the Ik original construction, but the name of the Ik Mak Mak Mak Mak Mak-2, which the plaintiff additionally performed, is not included in the C/DUT (GI), B/N, computerV, clocks, man-mades, labor costs, miscellaneous expenses, and official approval color. The name of the Ik Mak Mak Mak Mak Mak Mak Mak Mak 3-2 of the judgment of the court of first instance added "It is difficult to see that the Ik Mak Mak Mak Mak Dok Mak Do, the construction of a safety net, the installation of a safe network hardware, and the installation of a license."

The 12th to 15th of the decision of the first instance shall be followed as follows.

1) As to the claim for set-off against the damage claim due to defects, the defendant's summary of the defendant's assertion 1) The defendant made the plaintiff to repair the above defects because there are defects identical to the statement in attached Table 1-G store defect repair and other construction-related damage adjustment table ‘L'>, and the remuneration amount shall be KRW 50,050,00 (including value-added tax) in attached Table 1, G A/S 33,70,000, the total amount of construction cost of KRW 37,400,000 (including value-added tax) and the total amount of KRW 45,00,000,000 (including value-added tax 50,050,000,000). This is to distinguish the amount of KRW 45,00,000 for each estimate (Article 4-1).