A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 05:50 on January 9, 2015, the Defendant driven DK-5 vehicles at the 2km section from the front Do in front of the Gancheon-si, Gancheon-si, Gancheon-si, Gancheon-si, Gancheon-do, to the lower 535 km-si, Gancheon-si, Gancheon-si, Gancheon-si, Gancheon-si, Gancheon-si, Gancheon-do.

2. The injured Defendant was driving the said K5 car at the same time and at the same place as the above paragraph 1. Paragraph 1., and received the victim E (the age 49) from the victim E (the age 5) who was parked on the road north 535 east-ro, west-ro, west-ro, west-ro, west-ro, west-do, and tried to open a 5-car door and leave the site, while the victim who heard shock was able to hear the shock, while she got out of the site, she sold three times the victim’s clothes by drinking with the Defendant’s knife who was able to put the victim’s breast by hand, and got out the victim’s chest.

In this regard, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as climatic salt, tensions, etc. that need to be treated for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each witness statement in the F and E preparation;

1. Report on actions taken against an employer, and report on the status of an employer driver;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. On-site photographs;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel asserted that the instant vehicle was driven by G while the Defendant was seated at the time of the operation of the instant vehicle, and denied criminal facts under paragraph (1) of the same Article.

However, E and F have gone to the instant vehicle within one to two minutes after hearing sound of the instant vehicle owned by E, and the Defendant consistently stated that the instant vehicle was seated in the driver’s seat of the instant vehicle, and in light of other circumstances before and after detection, the Defendant is fully guilty of the facts constituting the instant vehicle under paragraph (1).

G-based, G-based, even in a driver's seat margin.