1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 3, 2015, the Defendant publicly announced the classification of the curriculum books for middle and high schools, with the content that the curriculum books for middle and high school history and the Korean History Text (hereinafter collectively referred to as “sate textbooks”) shall be published as government-designated books.

B. On November 24, 2015, the Defendant confirmed a list of 47 historical textbook authors composed of 47 professors, middle and high school teachers, etc.

C. Around November 30, 2015, the Defendant confirmed the list of 16 historical textbooks compilation deliberation committees composed of 16 professors, professors, teachers of middle and high schools, parents, etc.

The Compilation Review Committee has deliberated on the compilation standards of textbooks, correspondence, etc., reviewed and deliberated the draft in the textbook writing process, and played a role of demanding revision and supplementation.

On November 20, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a claim with the Defendant for the disclosure of each of the information listed in Tables 1 and 2 of Schedule 1 (hereinafter referred to as “instant information”); however, on December 3, 2015, the Defendant rejected the request on the following grounds:

(hereinafter “Disposition”). ① The instant information included “information in the process of decision-making or internal review” under Article 9(1)5 of the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter “Information Disclosure Act”) and determined non-disclosure.

② The second information of this case determined non-disclosure as being “personal information, such as name, resident registration number, etc., which, if disclosed, could seriously interfere with the fair performance of duties or research and development” under Article 9(1)5 of the Information Disclosure Act and “personal information, such as name, resident registration number, etc., which, if disclosed, could infringe on the privacy or freedom of private life.”

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1-1, 2, .