1. On October 18, 2012, the Defendants and Nonparty C with respect to 1/5 shares of each real estate listed in the attached Table of Real Estate List.

1. As to the cause of claim

A. The facts of recognition 1) The promotional mutual savings bank company filed a lawsuit against C by Seoul Central District Court 2009Gau2561592 against “19,767,082 won and the amount calculated by the rate of 20% per annum from May 27, 2010 to the date of full payment,” and received a judgment in favor of all of the judgment on June 10, 2010. The above judgment became final and conclusive, and thereafter the Plaintiff acquired the claim against C with respect to the promotion mutual savings bank C (hereinafter referred to as “the claim against the Plaintiff”).

(2) On October 18, 2012, D, the owner of the real estate listed in the annexed real estate list (hereinafter “instant real estate”), died on October 18, 2012, and five persons, including the Defendants, C, E, and F, who were the children of the network D (hereinafter “the deceased”), inherited the deceased’s property. As to the instant real estate, the registration of transfer of one-half shares of the Defendants was completed in the future on the grounds of inheritance by inheritance under the title 1608 of the receipt of the Seocho District Court’s early branch support as of November 12, 2013, under the title 1608 as of October 18, 2012 (hereinafter “instant division agreement”). (The total market value of the instant real estate at that time is equivalent to KRW 34,719,00,000, total market value of the instant real estate).

(3) The Defendants sold the instant real estate to G and completed the registration of ownership transfer in the amount of KRW 36 million on January 13, 2014.

4) C did not have any property other than the inheritance shares of the instant real estate at the time of the instant split-off consultation. [The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, and the purport

B. (1) Determination 1) A of the instant real estate, which is the sole property of C, renounced the inheritance shares of the instant real estate and agreed on the division of this case to the effect that the Defendants inherit both of them. In a case where a debtor with excessive debts has renounced his/her right to the inherited property while holding a divided agreement on the division of inherited property and the joint security against general creditors has decreased, in principle, against the Plaintiff, a creditor.