logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.10.19 2016고단2424
사기
Text

[Defendant A] The punishment against Defendant A shall be determined by imprisonment for eight months.

[Defendant B] Imprisonment with prison labor for Defendant B

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative of D from around August 2004, who was engaged in the mid-term trading business, and Defendant B is the person who operated D with Defendant A from August 2008.

1. Defendant A and E’s co-principal committed a mid-term transaction: (a) under the knowledge of the fact that construction machinery not manufactured by E, who is an employee of a local government-invested company, had been aware of the fact that there was a document-based transaction, and had it registered with the competent government office, and requested E to obtain a loan from the financial company, such as a new cooperation, by requesting E to obtain a loan; and (b) E prepares false documents related to manufacturing of construction machinery, as if they actually manufactured pumps and sun-dried air using a chassis number created voluntarily by a new engineering company, which is a construction machinery manufacturer company, and then registers the construction machinery register as if they acquired the pumps and sun-dried air that do not exist in the name of the Defendant and son.

On May 16, 2008, the Defendant made a false statement with E to the effect that the Defendant would provide the above pumps as collateral to the employees in charge of the victim's tolerances celebs celebs celebs celebs celebs celebs celebs celebs celebs celebs celebs celebs celebs.

In collusion with E, the Defendant, by deceiving employees in charge of lending the victim's speech and communication and deceiving them, received a sum of KRW 70 million owned by the victims from two employees in charge, and acquired a total of KRW 140 million under the name of loans.

B. On March 11, 2009, the Defendant, together with the Defendant, was a victim, even though the Defendant was a construction machine registered in the name of the Defendant F, the wife of which did not exist, in the Defendant’s office of the Korea Saemaul Community Fund.

arrow