A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 16, 2015, the Defendant received a report from the Defendant’s house located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, on October 23:10, 2015, and received a report from 112 that a drunk is accompanied by what he was inside his house, and sent to the site, and received a request for a written request from police officers such as police guards D, etc. belonging to the Seoul Dobong Police Station C police box, which was called to the site, to open a door, and “a person is accompanied by inside the house.”

This Chewing arbita bitch bitch, bitch bitch, bitch bitch, and any son reported.

The term "I ambling," and continuously examined the wall, and assaulted D's breast part in front of the house of the above defendant, such as the head.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. A written statement of F and G;

1. 112 A list of reported cases;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of crime places;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of applicable sentences under law: Imprisonment for one month to five years; and

2. The scope of the recommended punishment on the sentencing criteria [the scope of the recommended punishment] and the basic area (referring to six months to one year and four months from imprisonment) of the type of the one (Interference with the performance of official duties and coercion of duties) shall be limited to the scope of the recommended punishment on the sentencing criteria.

3. As the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, committed disturbance, such as attaching things in the house and passing sex, and neighboring residents filed a 112 report, the police officers called upon receiving the said 112 report also demanded a door opening to confirm the sound in which the goods are installed inside the Defendant’s house, and the police officers called upon upon receiving the said 112 report also demand a door opening to confirm it. The circumstances leading to the instant crime, such as going beyond the fence from the inside of the house and obstructing the performance of official duties, and the method of committing the instant crime, are disadvantageous to the Defendant.