The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the court below (three years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following facts: (a) the defendant led to the confession of each of the crimes of this case and made it against himself; (b) the amount of damage was relatively small; (c) the court below deposited the victim G with the victim E; (d) the victim did not want the punishment; (e) the defendant's family members want to support the defendant's poor maternity; and (e) the defendant's family members want to guide the defendant; (c) each of the crimes of this case committed two times at night during a period of one month; (d) theft of property and attempted to steals property over four times; and (e) repeat without a license even though the driver's license was not acquired for a considerable period of time; (d) the defendant was punished for the same kind of crime; (e) the defendant did not have any history of punishment for the crime such as theft, without a license; and (e) the defendant did not have any motive to commit the crime of larceny; and (e) the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for more than three months after the end of the crime and its execution period of punishment.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.