The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In the case of mistake of facts, the telecom with the telecom, where a guest makes a settlement with an unmanned machine, the Defendant was unaware of whether the guest was a guest or not.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the grounds of unreasonable sentencing (the fine of 500,000 won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court in determining the assertion of mistake of facts, it is reasonable to deem that the Defendant had had had a negligence in relation to the accommodation of sexual intercourses of juveniles D at least.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of mistake is without merit.

1) At the police station, the Defendant stated, “At the time, the male guest stopped the vehicle on the first floor. At the time, I left the vehicle to park instead of the guest, I left the vehicle on behalf of the guest.” “I have been on board the vehicle with male and female. There has been a difference between the male and female. I have been on board the vehicle. At the same time, I have made a payment by a card using the vending machine and entered the room under C. At the time, I have been on the vehicle. At the time, because the male portion was driving and 40 or more, I did not simply have to confirm the personal information of the female member with the knowledge of the number of related parties.” (The investigation record 53 pages) At the police station, I have been aware that there was a room between E and D, who are the guests of the instant case, and I have been on the 6th day after being given the witness’s personal information from the police station to prevent the minors from being on the 1 to 6th day of this case’s identification card.”

The number of men aged 47 and D are 16.