A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 3, 2017, the Defendant stated to the effect that “the Defendant becomes a bad credit holder due to width,” and that “the Defendant was in the president room of the Victim D(51) operated in Daegu-gu, Seo-gu, Daegu-gu (C)” around 20:00, the Defendant called to the effect that “the Defendant becomes a bad credit holder due to collapse,” and that “the Defendant was ultimately responsible for human life as a bad credit holder,” from that time to that point.

5. Until July 17, 200, the Defendant 1 told the victim to the effect that “if he does not give money to a coffee shop, he would know the fact that the Defendant and the victim made a sexual intercourse to the wife of the victim,” by directly talking the victim or sending the victim text messages.

As such, the Defendant: (a) the victim frightened and frightened; and (b) the victim frightened

5. Around 22.20 20 :20 : (a) the Daegu Bank, the face value of which is equivalent to KRW 10,000,000, issued five copies of the check to him/her at the above sex and the president room, and sent the above president room.

Accordingly, the defendant received property by threatening the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D;

1. Recording notes, each text message photograph, and each letter;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a summary of the results of investigation (whether to terminate intimidation and to accept it);

1. Article 350 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of protection and observation and sentencing Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act was already committed by the defendant, despite the fact that the defendant had already been sentenced to suspended sentence due to the crime of assault against the same victim, and it is not very good to commit the crime. In addition, if the defendant sent the victim a letter, message and telephone call for over a month, it seems that the victim would have suffered serious mental harm, and the victim did not receive a letter from the victim. Meanwhile, the defendant was committed at the time of the crime of this case, and 5.5.