1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that C, one of its own land, is in progress due to the lack of business funds, and thus, C, one hundred and fifty million won, would be repaid after six months if it was lent to the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff, on March 28, 2013, lent it to the Defendant by means of remitting KRW 150,000 to D’s deposit account, a creditor of C, in accordance with a loan loan agreement with the Defendant, pursuant to a loan agreement with the Defendant, and accordingly, the Defendant sought payment of KRW 150,00,000 and delay damages.

2. Therefore, as to whether a loan contract for consumption was concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant as alleged by the Plaintiff, the witness E’s testimony is difficult to believe in light of the relationship with the Plaintiff, etc. in light of the relationship with the Plaintiff, etc., and it is not sufficient to recognize only the entries of No. 2 and the result of the order given by this court to submit financial transaction information to D. The Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit, as there is no other evidence to

3. According to the conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit.