All appeals by the defendant are dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

The reasoning for this part of this judgment is as follows, except for dismissal or addition as follows: the relevant part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.

(main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act). The term “Plaintiff” shall be changed to “The Network A”.

The 7th 5th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth.

7. The following shall be deleted from the 6th line "on, from occupation to occupation", and the following shall be added thereto:

On January 22, 2020, “The Network A died, and on May 1, 2020, the plaintiffs completed the registration of ownership transfer on each of the instant real estate on the grounds of inheritance by agreement and division.” The following judgments are added to the admissibility of evidence Nos. 1 B or 1.

“Plaintiffs No. B and 1 (No. B and 8) have reached this court, and evidence No. B and 8 are the same.

) Although the previous confession as to the establishment of the authenticity was contrary to the truth and based on mistake, the above assertion is not accepted as there is no evidence to acknowledge it." As examined in the above fact-finding on the grounds of the claim, the agreement of this case was lawfully terminated since the court of first instance failed to pay rent of at least three rents to Codefendant B and C, and the network A expressed its intention to terminate the lease contract of this case.

(Article 10-8 of the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act (Article 10-8). Thus, the sub-lease contract of this case, which was established based on the lease contract of this case, has also been terminated, and the sub-lease bears the obligation directly to the lessor. Thus, the sub-lease does not have a direct legal relationship between the sub-lessee and the lessor on the ground that the lessor gave consent of the lessor

Pursuant to the above provisions, the sub-lessee is only liable to the lessor and may not demand the lessor to return the deposit paid to the sub-contractor.

Even in the position of the former person having chonsegwon, he/she does not have any rights and obligations against the former person having chonsegwon.