The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant did not consult with the victim E on the price of the punishment and consulted with H, and the victim E only heard and purchased the punishment with H only, and the Defendant did not engage in any deceptive act, such as talking that the compensation for the victim E would not have been determined.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, the defendant continued to accompany the victim E to make a talk with I and to display a punishment, but the defendant continued to be accompanied during the coming to show a punishment, and the defendant, the seller, even though most of the punishments already did not have any economic value because of the lack of any economic value, purchasing the punishment by paying the amount of 10 million won to the victim E, and if it is not clear whether the compensation for the punishments was made or not, it does not appear that a separate negotiation was made on such a case, even though it does not appear that there was a separate negotiation, and that H and I had a wrong explanation.

In light of the fact that the Defendant’s implied consent to the actual situation as a seller during the time when the Defendant was accompanied with the victim E can be seen as deception by omission, the lower court’s conviction of the facts charged in the instant case is justifiable and the Defendant’s assertion of mistake of facts is without merit.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.