A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above imprisonment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a sexual traffic business with the trade name “D” from the militaryposi-si C and the third floor.

From the beginning of June 2013 to August 29, 2013, the Defendant employed E (one-day “F,” etc. at the said business establishment as an employee, and, on August 29, 2013, received KRW 100,000 from the unspecified number of customers, such as paying KRW 100,000 to the unqualified names of customers and allowing them to have a sexual intercourse with E, and then, the Defendant had 40,000 won with the remaining female employees to have sexual intercourse with the customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of E, G, and H;

1. A criminal investigation report (98 pages of investigation records);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The former part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic (No. 1 and No. 2) and Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act (No. 3 through 5);

1. The punishment shall be determined as per the Disposition, taking into account the following factors: (a) the reason for sentencing of the latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic [the amount of additional collection: (b) the fact that the defendant has been sentenced to a fine of 5 million won for the same kind of crime around 2003; (c) the fact that he/she continued to arrange sexual traffic at the same place where he/she committed the instant crime on July 2013; (d) the fact that he/she had been investigated about the suspicion that he/she had not been punished due to lack of evidence; (e) the scale of business is not small, such as having five rooms and employing three employees; and (e) the profit accrued from the instant crime; and (e) the profit accrued from the instant crime;