1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On April 30, 2017, around 13:15, the Defendant was assaulted by the victim E (57 years old) from the gas station located in Gwangju Northern-gu D (hereinafter “instant gas station”), and subsequently, the Defendant saw the face and neck of the victim by her hand three to four times, and led the Defendant to a fluoral base in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. E statements;

1. A medical certificate of injury of doctor F;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant was unilaterally assaulted by the victim E and did not cause any injury to the victim E.

However, in a case where the victim’s statement is generally consistent and consistent with the facts charged, it shall not be rejected without permission, unless there exists any separate evidence to deem that the defendant and the victim’s body were objectively acceptable from an objective perspective, and where the witness’s statement is consistent with the main part of the statement, it does not unreasonably deny the credibility of the victim’s statement solely on the ground that the witness’s statement is not somewhat consistent with the witness’s statement on other minor matters (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2012Do2631, Jun. 28, 2012; 2007Do10728, Mar. 14, 2008). In such a case, the victim’s statement is consistent with the victim’s statement in investigative agency and this court, and witness G also stated that the victim’s body was fighting between the victim and the victim’s body after the crime of this case. Thus, the victim’s testimony was consistent with the victim’s testimony in E.

I would like to say.

According to each of the above evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, such as the statement of credibility E, the victim E is the oil charge at the gas station of this case operated by the defendant.