Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant organized the 20 foot number system in Seoul in Seoul, and the Defendant recruited various members by joining the 4 unit and the victim D with two units. The Defendant, as a leader, collected the limit of KRW 500,000 per one unit (10,000 won per one unit) from the members of the fraternity, and managed the affairs to pay the fraternity to the members of the fraternity in accordance with the prescribed number.
Accordingly, even though the Defendant collected the fraternity from around that time to September 2015 with members of the fraternity, the Defendant did not pay the fraternity due to economic difficulties, and the Defendant used the fraternity received from the members of the fraternity, such as the victim, to pay the fraternity to the members of the fraternity, while paying the fraternity to the members of the fraternity, the Defendant did not pay the fraternity corresponding to the two accounts to the victim.
As a result, the Defendant acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 20 million from an act in violation of his duties, thereby causing property damage equivalent to the same amount to the victim.
On October 4, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement that “The insurance contract is terminated on the wind that did not pay the insurance money,” to the victim F of Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul E’s Dobong-gu’s in-house factory, and that “The payment of the insurance money would be 33 million won if the insurance contract is terminated after the payment, and 6 million won if the contract is terminated after the payment.” Thus, the Defendant would pay 36 million won after the termination of the insurance.”
However, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim, it was thought that it was used as a guidance for operating expenses of the fixed-term factory and the members of the fraternity operating the fixed-term factory, such as the payment of the original and auxiliary payments, so there was no intention or ability to return the borrowed money by cancelling the insurance after the insurance was paid normally.
The defendant deceivings the victim as such.