The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant has stolen the gift certificates of this case.

2. In the first instance trial, the Defendant argued that the gift certificates were not stolen, and that the seized gift certificates were received from the person.

As to this, the court below rejected the Defendant’s assertion on the following grounds: (a) the circumstance in which the gift certificates were seized from the Defendant; (b) the Defendant refused to identify the person for whom the seized gift certificates were received from the Defendant; and (c) the victim was paid the new global gift certificates from the stolen gift certificates in his company; and (d) the serial numbers of the new global gift certificates discovered from the Defendant’s bank were continued to coincide with the serial numbers of the new global gift certificates that the victim received from the company.

Examining the records compared with the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the judgment of the court below is justified.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.