The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence (one hundred months of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection five hundred thousand won) imposed by the court below on the summary of the grounds of appeal of this case is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant seems to have recognized the instant crime from the time when the first crackdowns, and to reflect his mistake.

In addition, the profit derived from the crime is only 500,000 won because the size of the game of this case operated by the defendant is not large and the actual operation period is not long.

In addition, the fact that the defendant's additional plate attachment, etc. is not good for health, and that the wife who has been divorced due to economic circumstances is an dynasty to dynasty to dynasty, etc. is considered in favor of the defendant.

However, the crime of this case, as a business owner, provides customers with game products not rated by the Game Management Committee in collusion with the defendant B, and exchange the result obtained through the use of game products, such as promoting an excessive gambling spirit for the general public and hindering the awareness of labor, is more serious penalty for unlawful conduct.

Furthermore, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of a repeated crime not exceeding one year and six months; (b) the Defendant had committed the instant crime during the period of a suspended sentence due to the same kind of crime; (c) the Defendant has been serving a number of criminal records due to any other crime; (d) the circumstances favorable to the Defendant appears to have been reflected in sentencing; and (e) other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (e) the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence determined by the lower court is too unreasonable

The defendant's ground of appeal cannot be accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit. Thus, the defendant's appeal is in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.