The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the lower court (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. There are extenuating circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant led to the confession of the crime, and the fact that the judgment could have been rendered simultaneously with the case of fraud that became final and conclusive, taking into account equity and equity.

B. On the other hand, the crime of this case is a case of deceiving the victims and deceiving approximately KRW 80 million in total, and the crime of this case is not easy in light of the content of the defendant's deception, relationship with the victims, and the amount of defraudation.

In addition, in light of the fact that no damage recovery has been made until now and no effort has been made to repay the damage, it is inevitable to make a sentence that does not impose a strict liability on the defendant, and it is inevitable to make a sentence.

In addition, considering all sentencing conditions indicated in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, family relation, living environment, details and result of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence of the lower court is adequate.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit and thus dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.