The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant is not guilty that he will not use a person who will spread salt acid to his will.

In the facts charged of this case, there was no threat of the victim as stated in the facts charged of this case, and there was no threat to the main employees of the main office to sit at the waiting room at the entrance of the main office, and there was no interference with the business of the victim by preventing the visitors from having access.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentencing (an amount of KRW 1.5 million) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Although the Defendant alleged the same purport as the grounds for appeal at the lower court’s judgment, the lower court rejected the above argument and found the Defendant guilty of all the facts charged in this case by comprehensively taking account of the following evidence. In light of the fact that the victim’s investigative agency that corresponds to the facts charged in this case’s testimony from the lower court to the court of the lower court is consistent, relatively specific, and there are no other circumstances to suspect the credibility thereof, and that the Defendant did not sit at the main entrance of the main office, thereby significantly hindering the main office’s business affairs, as the Defendant did not appear at the main office, the lower court’s determination is just and acceptable, and there is no error of misunderstanding the facts alleged by the Defendant.

The defendant's assertion of facts is without merit.

B. Although there are circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant shows the attitude of recognizing and opposing the defendant's mistake, the circumstance leading up to the crime, the first offender, etc. However, in light of the contents of intimidation notified by the defendant, the nature of the crime is not good in light of the contents of intimidation notified by the defendant, and the defendant did not agree with the victim, there is no change of circumstances that may reduce the punishment of the court below in the trial at the first instance, and other facts that there are no changes of circumstances that are disadvantageous to the defendant, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, the motive and consequence of the