The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair punishment) by the court below is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The following facts are the factors for sentencing favorable to the defendant: (a) the defendant, who led to the confession of the facts charged, is against his mistake; (b) the defendant was admitted to and withdrawn from the police station for about two years after he was admitted to the "Yeong Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fa

However, the crime of this case was committed by the Defendant who joined the criminal organization called "Yeong Madropo-sect" and assaulted persons who passed along with P and R, which is very bad, and on May 27, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. on the grounds that he was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence on May 27, 2010. The above judgment became final and conclusive on June 4, 2010. The Defendant was not against the period of suspended sentence, but against the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, and other sentencing data expressed in the arguments such as the Defendant’s age, character and environment, etc., the sentence of the court below cannot be justified.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no reason to dismiss the defendant's appeal.