1. The defendant shall make on March 25, 199, the Suwon District Court's registration office with respect to the area of 783 square meters prior to the wife population C, which is permissible from the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. (1) On March 2, 191, the Plaintiff, the Defendant, etc. entered into a sales contract with the Defendant, etc. to purchase KRW 1,788 square meters (hereinafter “F lands before division”) prior to the purchase price in the name of 308,370,000 via D’s agent E to operate a new construction and sale business of multi-family housing.

After that, the transfer registration of ownership was completed in the name of G in the form of E on May 9, 1991.

(2) On August 19, 192, part of F land before subdivision and H land above the I building A, F land before subdivision and J land above the I building B, and on the land before subdivision, on March 19, 196, on the land above the I building B, and on the land before subdivision, on November 12, 1993, KR Dong C, respectively, obtained approval for use.

(3) The F land before subdivision was partitioned on May 28, 1996 as follows.

In the above division process, the Defendant completed the ownership transfer registration (hereinafter “the ownership transfer registration of this case”) on April 13, 1996 with respect to the land of this case as the ground of the division of the common property on May 28, 1996, by means of the Suwon District Court Registry No. 27451 on May 28, 1996, for the purpose of the above Adong site ownership M 63N 10 O 54 P 357, the sum of the purpose of the above Adong site ownership (hereinafter “Adong site ownership registration”).

The Plaintiff and the Defendant initially tried to register the ownership transfer as the Plaintiff’s shares 1/5 and the Defendant’s shares 4/5, but only the Defendant did not satisfy the legal requirements, such as the Farmland Act, etc. necessary for the Plaintiff to acquire ownership of the instant land, and completed the registration of ownership transfer.

B. (1) After the registration of the establishment of a neighboring mortgage on the land of this case was completed under the name of the plaintiff, the plaintiff and the defendant's new construction and sale of the above multi-family housing were non-existent due to various circumstances, and the plaintiff's shares in the