Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Switzerland car.

On November 7, 2013, the Defendant driven the said car at a speed of about 20 km to 30 km in the speed of 10 km and 10 km in the front of the home line in the vicinity of the 10-dong-gu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant continued to drive the said car at a speed of about 20 km to 30 km to 10 km in the front of the home line in front of the 10-dong-gu, Daegu-gu.

At the same time, a crosswalk is installed in the front direction of the defendant's running on the road, so if a pedestrian passes the crosswalk as well as a driver of the motor vehicle by taking into account well the front direction of the motor vehicle, the driver of the motor vehicle, by neglecting his duty of care to temporarily stop in front of the crosswalk and not to obstruct or endanger the passage of the pedestrian, and by neglecting his duty of care to do so, did not discover the victim C (23 years of age) who cross the above crosswalk to the left side of the above crosswalk, and by failing to discover the victim C (23 years of age) and by taking the front part of the above motor vehicle over the floor, the part of the victim's left side bridge part of the above motor vehicle exceeded the floor, thereby resulting in the victim's injury, such as two gales, brain-sin, salvin, and anal part, which require the victim to

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of occurrence of a traffic accident prepared C;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. A photograph of the damaged Myeon and caps of the damaged Myeon;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the order of provisional payment was that the Defendant violated the duty of pedestrian protection in the crosswalk and caused the instant accident, and accordingly, the victim was relatively serious, but only agreed with the victim.