A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On May 11, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud at the Daejeon District Court, and the execution of the sentence was completed in the Daejeon Prison on December 29, 2014.

On June 2015, the Defendant is the head of the party who is a member of the Seoul Special Self-Governing Party at a mutually influorous restaurant located in the situation Dong-gu Daejeon Special Metropolitan City on the date on which June 2015.

Daejeon Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon had 270 square meters of the site for electric power supply to be transferred from another person.

On that ground, the phrase “the cost of transferring the interior house under four names, the cost of transferring the interior registration, the cost of construction cost, and the cost of construction,” was false.

However, in fact, the defendant thought that he would receive money from the injured party to use it for living expenses, debt repayment, etc., and there was no intention or ability to transfer the name of the injured party by either transferring the site for electric source D in Seo-gu Daejeon or building the electric source house on that site.

Around June 22, 2015, the Defendant received KRW 4.877,00,000 from the damaged party in total on 22 occasions in terms of the registration transfer cost and construction cost, including the receipt of KRW 72,420,000,00 from the damaged party to December 9, 2016 in the name of the agricultural bank account (E) in the name of the Defendant’s name.

After all, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A detailed statement of transactions with the National Bank;

1. References to inquiries, such as criminal history, and application of the Act on Report of Investigation;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, inclusive, with prison labor under Article 347 of the Criminal Act and the choice of applicable laws and punishment for the crime

1. Reasons for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes: The criminal records which have been punished several times for the same kind of crime, as well as the criminal records committed during the period of repeated crimes, and the fact that the amount of defraudation is large amount and the amount of obtaination is not repaid, is contrary to the circumstances that are favorable to the punishment;