1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

The National Institute of Korean History (Organizations affiliated with the Ministry of Education under the supplementary intervenor) is a national feed compilation institution that collects and prepares Korean history-related feed in accordance with the Act on the Collection and Compilation of Feed and the Dissemination of Korean History (hereinafter “Korean History Dissemination Act”).

Plaintiff

A and Plaintiff B were commissioned as a member of the Research Committee of the Korean History Compilation Committee, respectively.

The National Institute of Korean History re-commissioned the plaintiffs as feed research members each year on December 31, 2014, but decided not to re-commission them as feed research members.

(hereinafter “instant refusal to re-commission”). On February 9, 2015, the Plaintiffs filed an application for remedy with the Seoul Regional Labor Relations Commission against the refusal to re-commission the instant case, and on April 8, 2015, the Seoul Regional Labor Relations Commission dismissed the application for remedy on the ground that “the Plaintiffs have the right to renew the employment contract but the refusal to renew the National Institute of Korean History has reasonable grounds.”

The Plaintiffs appealed and filed an application for reexamination with the National Labor Relations Commission on May 4, 2015, and the National Labor Relations Commission dismissed the application for reexamination on July 7, 2015.

(2) The Plaintiffs actively participated in the issue of rectifying discrimination against historical researchers, and the Plaintiffs rejected the instant re-commission due to retaliation against the National Institute of Korean History’s Compilation.

In addition, the "Plan for Performance Evaluation Research Committee (Plan) of 2014, which is based on the rejection of re-commissioning by the National Institute of Korean History, lost fairness and rationality.

Therefore, the rejection of the re-commission of this case based on this is without reasonable grounds, and ultimately, the decision of the retrial of this case is illegal.

Judgment

related.