Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 80,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is an operator of B located enterprise B from around 2009 to February 2, 2016, and a person who has been engaged in food supply business, such as materials, to be provided to B employees of occupant enterprises.

When South Korean residents intend to visit North Korea, they shall obtain approval of visit from the Minister of Unification, and shall not obtain approval of visit by fraud or other improper means.

The Defendant, while operating a relocated company B, had his mind to conduct a restaurant business in order to expand the business in B, and had he knows that he knows about it.

D, after proposing a partnership, I heard the words that D would first seek to conduct a market survey in the region B from D and conspired with D to make D to visit B as if D is an employee of C.

Therefore, the Defendant and D, at the C office located in E around February 10, 2015, entered false information into “C, agency” in the workplace and position column of the applicant for the Inter-Korean Exchange and Cooperation System in the Ministry of Unification, “supply and Distribution Management of Food Materials” in the column for the purpose of visit, and transmitted D, to the department in charge of the Ministry of Unification, using a computer located therein.

3. 16. The same year from that time, including those approved by the Minister of Unification to visit B from that time.

6. Until December 23, 200, an application for approval of North Korea was filed four times as shown in the annexed list of crimes and obtained approval from North Korea three times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D or F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a request for business cooperation, reply to Ministry of Unification, copy of business registration certificate (business registration certificate and report of cooperative project);

1. Article 27 (1) 2 and Article 9 (1) of the Inter-Korean Exchange and Cooperation Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;