1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The facts below the basic facts are either apparent in the records or obvious to this Court.

On January 12, 2018, the Defendant received a certified copy of the decision on performance recommendation of this case and a written guidance for litigation directly from "Seoul building, Seongbuk-gu Seoul Building, and D" recorded as the Defendant's address at the instant complaint on January 12, 2018, and submitted a written objection against the decision on performance recommendation of this case on January 22, 2018.

In addition, on March 12, 2018, the Defendant was served with the first date of pleading by the court of first instance at the court of first instance at the Seongbuk-gu Seoul building and D, and on April 11, 2018, the Defendant was present at the first date of pleading by the court of first instance at the court of first instance at the court of first instance and was notified of the date of pronouncement as “by May 2, 2018.”

B. On May 1, 2018, the court of first instance rendered a decision to resume pleadings, and the notice of the date of resumption of pleadings was sent on May 14, 2018, to the effect that the notice of the date of resumption of pleadings was not sent from Seongbuk-gu C Building and D to the closed door absence.

C. On May 9, 2018, the Defendant is the “Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Road Name Address”: Seoul F. hereinafter referred to as “the service site of this case” in the first instance of May 2018.

D. The report on the change of service address was submitted.

The court of first instance ordered the second date for pleading, May 10, 2018, May 11, 2018, and May 23, 2018, respectively, to change the date. Although the notice of change under each of the above orders was served to the service site of this case, the service of the notice of change under each of the above orders was conducted so that the notice of change under each of the above orders is not served to the addressee as the addressee.

In addition, the defendant was absent on June 20, 2018 at the second date for pleading.

E. On June 20, 2018, the court of first instance served a notice of the date of pleading on June 20, 2018 on the third place of pleading, but served the notice on June 28, 2018, when the notice was not served due to the addressee’s unknown address.

In addition, the defendant was absent on July 18, 2018 at the third date for pleading.

F. On July 19, 2018, the court of first instance served the notice of the sentencing date on the instant service site, but did not serve the notice on the addressee’s unknown address.

G. On August 29, 2018, the court of first instance.