logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.12.23 2019가합581226
우선협상대상자지위 확인의 소
Text

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

A. A joint contractor with C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff Co., Ltd”) was organized to perform “F outsourced services.”

2) The Defendant-based Regional Procurement Service under the Defendant-based (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant” without distinction between affiliated organizations

(D) The “D Trust Services” (hereinafter “instant Services”)

3) The Intervenor joining the Defendant was a legal entity consisting of small and medium enterprise owners in the field of information and communication as its members pursuant to the Small and Medium Enterprise Cooperatives Act, and was selected as a priority bidder in the instant service tender.

(b) Public announcement of tender announcement for the instant service and re-public announcement of tender for the procurement commodities;

1. Matters referred to in the tender: G institution 1-2. Bidding: 1-3. Project period: 731 days after the contract: 18,533,636,820 won (estimated price 16,848,760,745 won);

7.The evaluation of proposals 7-1. The evaluation of proposals shall be conducted by the Public Procurement Service and by a procuring entity.

* Management status and mutually-beneficial cooperation during the quantitative evaluation shall be evaluated by the Public Procurement Service.

* The Project shall apply Article 3-2 of the "Detailed Criteria for the Evaluation of Contract Proposal by Negotiations with the Government Procurement Service" and shall constitute an evaluation committee as a professional evaluation committee.

8. Negotiation 8-1. Negotiations 8-1. The results of a comprehensive evaluation of the technical evaluation (90%) and price assessment (10%) of proposals, will be in order of high score braille.

However, as a result of the evaluation of the proposal, a person whose technical ability evaluation score is at least 85% of the allocation limit in the technical ability evaluation field shall be selected as an eligible

8-2. If a document (including a proposal) submitted is found to have been fraudulently or falsely prepared, it shall be excluded from the determination of the potential concessionaire and the successful bidder.

8-4.Other matters shall be in accordance with the terms "standards for the conclusion of contracts by negotiations" and "Detailed Criteria for the Evaluation of proposals for contracts by negotiations by the Government Procurement Service".

9. A letter of commitment to supply goods and technical assistance: The successful bidder shall be either submitted to the end-user institution (if successful bidder is successful bidder), 9-1.

arrow