logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.10.17 2014고단986
절도
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant from February 2014

3. From March 3, 2014, around 15:53, as of March 3, 2014, the victim E, a victim E, a right-hand container office located on the right-hand right-hand side of the D market, carried a paper stuffing 3060,000 won of the market price where the victim left the above place, which includes the gap in the management of the victim, was carried in 15:53, 201.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A E-document;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Report on occurrence of a theft;

1. Reports on internal investigation (the search of victims, on-site photographs, and attaching a list of damaged articles);

1. A report on internal investigation (attaching CCTV photographs around the site);

1. Investigation report (to attach photographs of CCTVs for the control of illegal spirits vehicles);

1. A investigative report (a) (a) accompanied by pictures of ricar photographs;

1. Investigation report (to attach photographs, such as clothes weight, disposed of by the A);

1. Investigation report (Attachment to gold-ho apartment CCTV photographs);

1. The investigation report (suspect's specific suspect) (the defendant asserts that there was no paper stuffing in the number of clothes. The defendant asserts that there was no paper stuffing in the shape of clothes. The following circumstances revealed by the evidence mentioned above; ① the victim E was unable to have a paper stuffing in the shape of clothes (the sealed in the tape) for about 5 minutes before the container being used by himself/herself as his/her office; the victim E was unable to have a paper stuffing in the shape of his/her office; and he/she stated that he/she had a door stuffing in the surrounding merchant after hearing the speech that he/she had a paper stuffing in the ria and left it on the face of the five minutes; ② the defendant did not have a paper stuffing in the scene of the crime that was temporarily taken around the crime, and the victim E did not have a paper stuffing.

arrow