1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for cases of cutting, deleting, or adding, as follows, and thus, it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts used for cutting, deleting, or adding them;

A. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the Act on the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection (hereinafter “Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act”) of 5th of the first instance judgment was amended to “former Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act (amended by Act No. 13081, Jan. 28, 2015; hereinafter “former Unfair Competition Prevention Act”)”.

B. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the first instance court 5th to 14th "after that," followed by the following:

After all, the court of first instance (Seoul Central District Court 201Da6009) acquitted the Defendant on the violation of the former Unfair Competition Prevention Act and occupational breach of trust on the exception processing code, and found the Defendant E and I guilty on the violation of the former Unfair Competition Prevention Act and the occupational breach of trust on the N Definition, and sentenced the Defendant E and I to the suspended sentence of 2 years in October, and the fine of 10,000,000 won to the Defendant company.

After all of the above judgments, the prosecutor and the Defendants appealed and appealed, but on December 15, 2016, the Supreme Court sentenced the dismissal of the appeal to the Supreme Court, which became final and conclusive.

(However, in the appellate trial, the abstract of this case is not stated in the part of "the whole flow of the RMI foundation" among the contents of the above NJ, and thus, the above part of the facts charged was additionally acquitted.

Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the Unfair Competition Prevention Act of 6th, 8, 10th, 21th, 13th, 12th, 16, 18th, 15th, 13, 15, and 17th, shall be amended to the former Unfair Competition Prevention Act.

The following shall be added from among the judgment of the first instance court, that there is no "I cannot look at" in the 9th sentence.

(6) This shall be applicable.