logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016.06.23 2016도4274
관광진흥법위반등
Text

All appeals are dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

In light of the records, the court below's decision of the court of first instance that found Defendant A not guilty on the charge of occupational embezzlement among the facts charged in this case on the ground that there is no proof of crime, is just in maintaining the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and found Defendant B guilty on the charge in this case on the ground that there is no proof of crime. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance that found Defendant B guilty on the charge in this case on the ground that there is no proof of crime, and it is not erroneous in the misapprehension of the legal principles as to the crime of occupational embezzlement and protection

On the other hand, the prosecutor appealed against the entire judgment of the court below, but there is no specific reason in the petition of appeal as to the guilty part against Defendant A, and there is no reason of objection in the statement of reason for appeal.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow