The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

Criminal facts have to be proved to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt (Article 307(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act). However, the selection of evidence and probative value of evidence conducted on the premise of fact-finding belong to the free judgment of the fact-finding court (Article 308 of the Criminal Procedure Act). The lower court, on the grounds stated in its reasoning, determined that the Defendant, as stated in its reasoning, recognized that the instant money and valuables were personally received from B while recognizing that they were the name of consideration for the selection of a specialized management businessman of rearrangement projects, and determined that the Defendant reversed the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged,

The allegation in the grounds of appeal is the purport of disputing the determination of the lower court on the facts that led to such determination. It is nothing more than denying the lower court’s determination on the selection and probative value of evidence, which belong to the free judgment of the fact-finding court. Furthermore, even if examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the aforementioned legal doctrine and the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence in violation

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.