The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) the Defendant was unable to seek jobs, resulting in the instant crime; (b) the wife suffered by the victim was knifeed by the Defendant, knifeing the knife (the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife

2. The court’s determination of the sentence that is unfair under Article 361-5 subparag. 15 of the Criminal Procedure Act means that the exercise of discretion to judge is unfair to the extent that it is permitted to exercise discretion, and ultimately, it is inappropriate to exercise discretion in sentencing from the type of discretion to the sentence through the applicable sentencing sentence, thereby causing unfair penalty.

Based on the statutory penalty, the sentencing is a unique area of the sentencing judgment of the first instance court, based on the trial-oriented principle and the principle of directness, which is based on the discretion of judges that take into account the conditions of sentencing prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act within a reasonable and appropriate scope.

Therefore, the court of first instance should reverse the judgment of the court of first instance only where the illegality of the judgment of the court of first instance is proven in light of the circumstances where the court of first instance limited the nature as an appellate court's inner part and added elements as an ex post facto appellate trial. As a result of the review of whether the sentencing of the court of first instance is unfair, it is possible to change the conditions of sentencing compared to the judgment of the court of first instance,