logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2019.05.24 2018고단2830
식품위생법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around July 1, 2014, the Defendant received a general restaurant of “D” located in Gyeyang-gu, Gyeyang-gu (Seoul) from B and operated the said “D” in the name of B from around that time to July 16, 2017. From around July 17, 2017, the Defendant was a person who actually operated the said “D” from around July 1, 2014, including operating the said “D” in his own name E.

A person who intends to conduct a business prescribed by Presidential Decree shall obtain permission from the Minister of Food and Drug Safety or a Special Self-Governing City Mayor, a Special Self-Governing Province Governor, or the head of a Si/Gun/Gu for each type of business or each place of business, as prescribed by Presidential Decree, and accordingly a person who intends to conduct

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) had a F in charge of ice ice Viewing, snow stamping, and knickter work as a “chief of office”; and (b) operated “D” by receiving the sales of the said business from his own child E and managing it by Defendant; (c) had the facilities such as sound reflectrs and lighting fixtures installed in “D” without obtaining permission from the competent authority from January 17, 2018 to March 7, 2018; and (d) sold alcoholic beverages to many unspecified customers who visited “D” and had them sing down in line with the said sound reflectrs, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the witness F in the court;

1. Each police statement of E and G;

1. A written statement;

1. A business report certificate (D) and details of the change of a business operator;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that he had run the business of "D" at will during the period stated in the facts constituting the crime in F, and that the defendant did not run the business as above.

l.p. g., p.

arrow