A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 27, 2015, the Defendant reported by the Defendant at a singing room, around 16:58, at around 16:58, and received a report from the Defendant, and sent out, the E District SecurityF of the police station affiliated with the E District and the police officer G of the police station affiliated with the Defendant.

Then, on December 30, 2015, the Mayang-gu Police Station within the Mayang-ro 63, Annyang-gu, Annyang-gu, Annyang-gu, Annyang-gu, under the investigation of the above facts of the report, “H was flicking and flicking the flat of H, and the face was flicked to H.

The term “a statement was made for the purpose of punishment.”

However, there was no fact that H had his face taken by the defendant.

As a result, the defendant had H applied for criminal punishment for the purpose of having H punished punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness H and I;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of H by the prosecution;

1. 112 Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the details of handling reported cases;

1. Relevant Article 156 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Determination of the Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion on the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act; the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at the time, went beyond his body, and was subject to assault from the injured party on the ground that he had physical contact with the Defendant.

There was no choice but to recognize that the defendant had no intention to commit a crime, and the defendant had no intention to commit a crime.

The argument is asserted.

However, in full view of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, the Defendant had a criminal intent with no negligence at least.

I would like to say.

Therefore, we cannot accept the above argument of the defendant and his defense counsel.

A. The victim not only did the defendant drink in a singing room on the facts of the crime but also did not attach the defendant or have a ditch. Rather, the defendant is the defendant.